AN708 vishay siliconix document number: 70581 www.vishay.com faxback 408-970-5600 1 low-power universal-input power supply achieves high efficiency expanding global markets have created a demand for what have become known as universal-input power supplies that is, power supplies that allow devices to be plugged into wall outlets anywhere in the world. these power supplies must be able to operate directly from 100-, 110-, and 220-v ac power lines without the use of selector switches or jumpers. a power supply with the ability to operate under such conditions while remaining cost-effective is now becoming a necessity. in the under 30-w power range, meeting the above requirements while maintaining high efficiency has been a challenge. add to this the need to meet various international safety standards, and the circuit designer has his hands full. the demands of low-power universal-input power supplies are met by the si9120 pulse width modulation (pwm) controller from vishay siliconix. using the si9120, the flyback circuit presented in this application note demonstrates that designing universal-input supplies can be a simple task.
for the low power levels that are of interest here (under 30 w), the discontinuous-mode (dcm) flyback converter is the preferred topology. the biggest advantage of this topology is simplicity. the parts count in the power path cannot get any lower. the peak-to-average primary current ratio in a dcm flyback is high relative to other topologies; however, at low power levels, this is not a serious drawback. on-state losses are minimal. magnetics are small. also, the transformer reset voltage is set by the minimum input voltage and remains fairly constant as the line voltage changes. as a result, a 600-v mosfet proves adequate, even with ac inputs up to 300 v rms. the dcm flyback converter, when operated under current-mode control, provides a natural input volt-second limit, which helps keep the drain voltage from getting out of control during line or load transient conditions. also, today's power mosfets are able to withstand avalanche current many times greater than a low power circuit can typically deliver (see appendix a). as such, the mosfet will serve as a clamp for the occasional spike which may result from a short circuit or extreme load transient. cross regulation is fairly good, especially if leakage inductance between windings can be kept low. [1] in a universal-input application, meeting vde input-to-output isolation requirements is essential. depending on the end product, this can be as high as 3750-v rms, primary to secondary a figure that is totally inconsistent with the desire to achieve low leakage inductance. as a result, cross regulation between primary and secondary- referenced windings will be poor. this complicates the regulation of the primary-side bootstrap winding used to avoid secondary-to-primary feedback across the isolation boundary. the addition of a simple spike-blanking circuit solves the problem (see an707, adesigning low-power off-line flyback converters using the si9120 switchmode controller ico). when using the si9120 for universal-input applications, it is recommended that a bootstrap winding be employed. while not strictly necessary, the power dissipation and chip temperature are higher if bootstrapping is not utilized. as an example, at v in = 400 v dc and i cc = 1.5 ma, the power dissipation on the chip without a bootstrap is 600 mw. if a 10 v bootstrap supply is used, the dissipation is only 15 mw. this becomes more of a concern as the gate charge requirements of the power mosfet increase, since the value of i cc for the controller is largely dependent on gate drive demands. another advantage of the dcm flyback converter is its single-pole loop response. this makes compensating the feedback loop comparatively simple. in addition, transient response can be quite good in dcm flyback converters. it is possible (though not practical in a closed-loop system) to slew the power stage from no load to full load in only one switching cycle.
|